fairtrade urges eu delay eudr

Fairtrade Challenges the EU: Delay EUDR or Risk Collapse

Fairtrade urges EU to delay EUDR—could save small farms but spark industry backlash. Who wins the trade-off? Read on.

Fairtrade has been helping farmers collect geolocation data. It’s also been working on deforestation monitoring and risk checks. The group says its networks can boost data systems in rural areas. That support can help meet the rule that products must be traced to their origin. Fairtrade says this is key for coffee, cocoa, and other crops where supply chains are mixed.

The European Commission made changes in April 2025 to simplify some steps. It eased rules on bulk trade and annual statements. But Fairtrade warns that strict cut-off dates and mandatory satellite systems still pose problems. Producers need training and tools to use those systems. Fairtrade says extra time will let its regional teams roll out that support more widely.

A delay would let Fairtrade align its standards better with the EU law. Fairtrade already has stricter cut-off dates and risk measures. The group says harmonizing these rules will avoid duplication. It also says coordination with local forest programs and other certification schemes is needed. That would reduce paperwork and lower costs for small farms.

Industry and some politicians agree a delay could help. The European People’s Party has welcomed postponement. Trade groups and logistics firms say they need realistic timelines to meet due diligence duties. The Commission plans to use extra time to work with affected countries and reduce trade friction.

Key technical issues remain. Rules require the use of EU satellite systems and product individualisation. A country risk system will rate supplier areas. Annual deforestation statements aim to cut duplicate paperwork. Fairtrade argues the pause will prevent supply shocks and give farmers a fair chance to comply. data-informed considerations and harmonized standards could streamline compliance across regions.

Scroll to Top